??????????The comment comes amid hee88eightened tensions due to the Israel-Hamas war.

??????????But subcommittee members said that Santos was actively conspiring with his former campaign treasurer to falsify campaign finance reports.??????????But a group of his fellow New York Republicans renewed the efforee88t to expel him in October after he was hit with more charges accusing him of stealing campaign donors identities and putting thousands of dollars in unauthorized charges on their credit cards.

??????????finding that there was substantial evidence the congressman violated federal law and engaged in a complex web of illegal activity involving his finances.??????????Representative Santos sought to fraudulently exploit every aspect of his House candidacy for his own personal financial profit.??????????500 purchase on Santos campaign debit card from Mirza Aesthetics.ee88

??????????The committee said in a statement announcing the release of its findings that the investigative subcommittee tasked with examining allegations of misconduct by Santos unanimously concluded that there was substantial evidence that he knowingly caused his campaign committee to file false or incomplete reports with the Federal Election Commission (FEC).??????????the makeup store Sephora and for meals and parking.

??????????The full ethics panel unanimously voted to refer the evidence of Santos alleged violations to the Justice Department.

??????????while the investigative panel found an unreported PayPal payment of $1.??????????These arguments have no basis.

??????????Engoron wrote that Trumps attorneys have made repeated.??????????inappropriate remarks about my Principal Law Clerk.

??????????Defendants attorneys have made long speeches alleging that it is improper for a judge to consult with a law clerk during ongoing proceedings.??????????The gag order on the former president was imposed by Judge Arthur Engoron after a derogatory post appeared on Trumps Truth Social platform.