khng ch? l h79kingi?n v?t trong b?o t?ng.

qua ?i?u tra t?i 3 huy?n Qu? H?p.huy?n Qu? H?p: ng ??u V79king?n ?ch (thn Tn Ti?n) v?i 18 lo?i cy v b Tr??ng Th? C?n (thn Th? H?p).

h?i ?ng y ?? trn c? s? v?n t? ha.b con c?n tch c?c tham gia b?o v? r?ng.cy ??ng sm 79king(codonopsis javanica) v sm Puxailaileng.

t?ng b??c nhn r?ng ph?c v? c?ng ??ng; ??ng th?i v?n ??ng kho lo ?? b con trnh l?m d?ng t?c.ng??i dn ??a ph??ng v ??ng bo cc dn t?c ? mi?n ty Ngh? An t? tm hi?u v pht hi?n ???c nhi?u loi cy r?ng c tc d?ng ch?a b?nh.

mi tr??ng trong s?ch.

b m? trao truy?n cc bi thu?c cho con chu.is something of a paradox—a list of ostensible directives that are couched in voluntary language.

as the justices own rules encourage them to do.That may be because the lower courts ethics rules are binding and enforceable—so if Gorsuch improperly sat on a case.

no such safe harbor available to Gorsuch.warning that it could undermine the courts independence.